Episode 28 – Religion and Age Play
Posted by: spacey on: August 28, 2011
- In: Full Episodes | podcast
- Comment!
Episode 28 – Religion & Age Play
So these two jews, a christian, a muslim, a taoist, a solitary eclectic gnostic deist pagan, and an atheist all walk into a podcast… Join us as we talk with folks from a wide variety of faith walks about how religion and age play. We discuss how they their religious life and kink/age play interests, what their religious cannon has to say about kink and age play, and even learn how faith and age play inform each other in the lives of some of our guests.
Thanks again to our terrific panelists for being open and willing to talk about religion in their lives. These fine folks were Charlie, Peanut, Sysiphe, Elspeth, and Pene. Plus we great call-in moments and comments from the chat room folks during the recording.
Show Notes
- Coming Soon.
12 Responses to "Episode 28 – Religion and Age Play"
August 30, 2011 at 5:36 pm
Thanks for having me on guys, and letting me ramble randomly about being a heeb.
August 31, 2011 at 9:31 am
I live in Bremerton. I heard you say your in the Seattle area. Im too scared to meet people yet. I know a few boys that Im going to meet soon. Im at the begining of the podcast. I usily leave long comments like 3 or 4 times a show.lol. I just wanted to comment and tell you im local. If your on fetlife im Attendsboy420, and dont have much friends on there. Im trying to message people on there to meet more ageplayers that arent some guy poasting pictures from abdl websites, and saying they are him.
August 31, 2011 at 9:45 am
How come the kink people be mean to republicans? Im not a republican or a democrat. I think they both have some good ideahs and alot of bad ideah’s, but instead of working on their ideahs, they spend more time puting down, and trying to disprove the other partys ideahs. One party only wants to think about here and now, and just assumes everything will be fine. The other trys to act like they wont be able to operate their lives, if they are regulated.
September 6, 2011 at 6:59 pm
In large part it is because the Republican party holds as major tenants of the party platform some very sex-negative and kink-negative views. When a party works tirelessly to make sure our lifestyles are illegal, that our children do not get sex ed, and that we are not permitted to make our own choices about our bodies and family structure, how can we not object?
Sitting by and allowing the party to continue to move that agenda forward is self-destructive.
September 7, 2011 at 6:55 am
I agree. But the republican kinksters I’ve met often hide that they are, because of how they’re treated by kinky people. I think it’s part-and-parcel of that “painted with the same brush” phenomena.
It’s not fair to treat a moderate, centrist, economically conservative, socially-liberal republican the same way as you would a hyper-religious, far-right-leaning tea-party person, someone who is a republican as an unthinking ideology, rather than a political position.
What amazes me about this though is that when I point this out to said person who has suffered that “paintbrush injustice”, and say that gay people, trans people, and kinky people suffer from this far more often, and with far more dire results, it often goes in one elephant-ear, and out the other.
September 7, 2011 at 6:56 am
Which, as we’ve said before, is why if you want tolerance, you have to give it – to everyone.
September 8, 2011 at 6:21 pm
A vote for a politician that then goes on to push an agenda that hurts me is an ACTION that does my life real damage. That vote is an act of violence against me and my family.
September 9, 2011 at 9:10 am
You’re right – which is why *I* don’t vote for those sort of candidates. That’s why political discourse is a valuable activity, too.
August 31, 2011 at 10:20 am
I think i mentioned this in my first comment, from the other day. I was a Mormon, or LDS member, and I guess in their eyes I still am, but I dont consider myself one anymore, as of not even 3 months. Ive met alot of DL mormons online. No age playing ones though, but Ive heard stories of Bishops, and Stake Presidents, reacting the same way as the head Muslim guy, that I cant spell. Ofcorse they dont agree with sex before marige, or poliamery. I bet the FLDS would be ok with polyamery, since they are the polegamist mormon branch, that didnt want to give up the old ways, back in like the civil war era. The reason they had more than one wive in the first place is becaus most all of the men were killed. the wemen outnumberd the men 20-1 in utah, and they needed to reproduce, and take in widow’s/orphins. Or atleast tahts how it was justified. 
September 23, 2011 at 5:58 pm
Hey, I was just curious what you call yourself now. I dated a girl that had mormon parents (she called herself a christian) and they were about as conservative as could be. Imagining a mormon with a fetish is pretty funny. It’s sad that you were so afraid of judgment about it. God sucks! Become your own deity! 
[...] [...]
Leave a Reply
Search
Podcast Feeds
Pride
August 29, 2011 at 2:15 pm
Im about to listen to the podcast, so I figured I would comment on somthing really quick. I was mormon, untill about 9 or 10 weeks ago.lol. I held the priesthood and everything. I have a few Diaper Lover mormon firends, who are really really into church, and asked the people higher up. One guy mentioned diapers to his Bishop, and another to the stake president. They didnt have a problem with it, but Im sure they failed to mention the sexual part.lol. Unless they dont feel that way, I dont talk abotu sex stuff to them when we chat.lol. I got mad because I found out what the church does politicly, against gays. Yet its not a taxed political ogonisation, because its a church. But they pretty much funded all of Prop 8 in california. Im sure I will do 4 or 5 more comments, once the show starts.lol